: Every meal is a "symbolic act" and a form of power to influence global health and democracy. Debunking the "Protein Complementarity" Myth
The Original Food Revolution: Exploring "Diet for a Small Planet"
: World hunger is a result of ineffective food policy and the uneven distribution of resources, not a biological inability to grow enough food.
When Frances Moore Lappé published Diet for a Small Planet in 1971, she didn’t just write a cookbook; she sparked a political and ecological revolution. Selling over three million copies, the book challenged the narrative that world hunger was inevitable due to a lack of food, instead pointing to a wasteful, meat-centered industrial food system as the true culprit. The Core Argument: Efficiency and Equity
One of the book’s most famous concepts was —the idea that vegetarians must pair specific foods (like rice and beans) in a single meal to get "complete" protein.
Diet For A Small Planet 💎
: Every meal is a "symbolic act" and a form of power to influence global health and democracy. Debunking the "Protein Complementarity" Myth
The Original Food Revolution: Exploring "Diet for a Small Planet" Diet for a Small Planet
: World hunger is a result of ineffective food policy and the uneven distribution of resources, not a biological inability to grow enough food. : Every meal is a "symbolic act" and
When Frances Moore Lappé published Diet for a Small Planet in 1971, she didn’t just write a cookbook; she sparked a political and ecological revolution. Selling over three million copies, the book challenged the narrative that world hunger was inevitable due to a lack of food, instead pointing to a wasteful, meat-centered industrial food system as the true culprit. The Core Argument: Efficiency and Equity Selling over three million copies, the book challenged
One of the book’s most famous concepts was —the idea that vegetarians must pair specific foods (like rice and beans) in a single meal to get "complete" protein.
This could have to do with the pathing policy as well. The default SATP rule is likely going to be using MRU (most recently used) pathing policy for new devices, which only uses one of the available paths. Ideally they would be using Round Robin, which has an IOPs limit setting. That setting is 1000 by default I believe (would need to double check that), meaning that it sends 1000 IOPs down path 1, then 1000 IOPs down path 2, etc. That’s why the pathing policy could be at play.
To your question, having one path down is causing this logging to occur. Yes, it’s total possible if that path that went down is using MRU or RR with an IOPs limit of 1000, that when it goes down you’ll hit that 16 second HB timeout before nmp switches over to the next path.